|
September 8, 2002
BY JIM DeROGATIS POP MUSIC CRITIC
Of the many mysteries that linger from the alternative-rock heyday of the
early ’90s, near the top of the list is this one: Who was the “Jane” of
Jane’s Addiction? I finally had the chance to pose that question to
bandleader Perry Farrell in 1997, when he reunited the influential group for
its first “relapse” tour.
“First of all, the answer to what is in a name
has got no bounds,” Farrell said in his typically elliptical fashion. “It’s
eternally deep. I can tell you my name is Perry, or I can tell you my name
is Porno, or I can tell you my name is Jane. What is in a name? But at the
same time, it also declares that I’m not Jack or Jerry. What is in a name?
The answer is boundless, and as I say, profoundly deep.”
Uh, sure Perry. That clears it [ital] all [ital]
up.
Born Perry Bernstein, the spacey but visionary
artist moved to Los Angeles from New York in the early ’80 and adopted his
new stage name as a play on the word “peripheral.” He started making music
at seedy Hollywood clubs in a goth band called Psi Com (he issued one indie
E.P. in 1985) before hooking up with guitarist Dave Navarro, bassist Eric
Avery, and drummer Stephen Perkins and changing the name of the band to
Jane’s Addiction.
The group debuted with a self-titled album in
1997. Recorded live at the Roxy, “Jane’s Addiction” introduced the signature
mix of glam-rock gender-bending, Led Zeppelin riff-pilfering,
funky/psychedelic wanking, and heroin-chic posing, all delivered by a singer
who brought to mind Jon Anderson of Yes, with stranger New Age ideas and a
bit less of a vocal range. It was a rough, intoxicating sound, but the band
honed it on two subsequent and much more ambitious offerings.
Hardcore Jane’s fans remain divided over whether
1988’s “Nothing’s Shocking” or 1990’s “Ritual de Lo Habitual” stands as the
band’s ultimate masterpiece. Both helped define an era that would soon be
called “alternative.” Arriving just before the movement’s commercial
cooptation (which followed the breakthrough success of Nirvana’s “Nevermind”
in 1991), my vote goes to “Ritual,” which remains as inspiring for its
genre-defying soundscapes as its overall vibe of wanton hedonism.
As a defiant celebration of individuality, the
album basks in the joys of unrestrained freakdom. What Jane’s Addiction did
better than any of its peers was to illustrate that, in the end, alternative
was an [ital] attitude [ital] more than it was ever a [ital] sound
[ital]or a [ital] marketing plan. [ital]
“To the mosquitoes: We have more influence over
your children than you do, but we love your children,” Farrell writes in a
long essay included in the CD liner notes. “You want what’s best for them.
Consider them when planning the future, right? Oh mother, father, your
blindness to our most blessed gift, NATURE, leaves us with the overwhelming
task of correcting your utter mess. It also proves that you are no judge of
art, or of beauty.” The diatribe concludes: “The world looks at America
because we are the beautiful!”
You’re forgiven for thinking that the preceding
is a vintage hippieish rant because… well, the musicians were always a bunch
of hippies at heart. They took what was worth taking from the fabled ’60s
youth movement, but they lived in the present, mixing psychedelic idealism
and punkish realism in equal measures. There was as always much Velvet
Underground as Grateful Dead in their sound, along with a complex stew of a
thousand other ingredients. And they were mercifully free of irony, that
dreaded, distancing stance that would plague the majority of their Gen X
peers.
On “Ritual,” Jane’s meant what it said and said
what it meant, whether the song was a naďve but otherwise right-on attack on
anti-environmentalism (“Stop!”), a plea for community (“No One’s Leaving”),
a flaunting of society’s conventions (“Ain’t’ No Right” and the
kleptomaniac’s anthem, “Been Caught Stealing”), a lauding of individualism
(“Obvious”), or a warning against the evils of nostalgia and living in the
past (“Classic Girl”).
“They may say, ‘Those were the days…’/But in a
way, you know for us/These are the days!” Farrell sings in the key line in
the latter tune. And they certainly were.
Musically, critics tend to focus on Farrell’s
oh-so-distinctive voice and Navarro’s guitar (which could dish out metal
shred with the best of them, but generally favored imaginative washes of
color, drawing on elements of punk, funk, and psychedelia). Yet just as key
to the group’s unique attack were loping bassist Avery (who brought an
element of dub reggae to the party) and the group’s real M.V.P., drummer
Stephen Perkins, whose ability to move fluidly from a Bonhamesque rock stomp
to complicated worldbeat polyrhythms stands out not only in alternative
rock, but in rock history, period.
Listen especially to Perkins’ work on the
11-minute “Three Days,” which, like marathon lovemaking, builds slowly and
gently through three-quarters of its epic length before exploding in a
climactic frenzy.
Cudos are also due here to Dave Jerden, who
co-produced the album with Farrell. Yes, there are the unforgettable sonic
novelties. (Who can forget those barking dogs at the beginning of “Been
Caught Stealing”? While the song was played to death on MTV and radio, it
still packs an undeniable wallop every time you hear it.) But above and
beyond those slicks and tricks, there is a truly one-of-a-kind mood that
permeates the disc, an otherworldly mix that would motivate countless bands
to follow.
To this day, rare is the recording studio that
does not have a copy of this album handy in the short stack by the CD
player, next to the Zep and the Soundgarden, where engineers go for
inspiration when they want to kick a recording to the [ital] next
[ital] level.
Although it would become the swan song by the
first incarnation of the group (before Farrell introduced a new version of
Jane’s in ’97), “Ritual” was enough of a success that it allowed Farrell to
launch the diverse, multi-band Lollapalooza festival in 1991, before
disbanding the group and moving on with Perkins in Porno for Pyro. Twelve
years on, it is still a powerful work with the ability to surprise on every
listen—a mind-blowing accomplishment, and a true alternative to much of
mainstream rock music.
|
|