|
November 3,
2002
BY JIM DEROGATIS POP
MUSIC CRITIC
Opening on Friday, “8 Mile,” the highly
anticipated new film from “Wonder Boys” and “L.A. Confidential” director
Curtis Hanson, is one of the most conflicted movies about the music world
since “Sid and Nancy” in 1986.
One the one hand, like Alex Cox’s look at
the Sex Pistols and the English punk explosion of 1976, Hanson’s immersion
in Detroit’s inner-city hardcore hip-hop scene circa 1995 is an electrifying
examination of the artistry of rap and the milieu that produces it. It’s
powered by an obvious love of the music, and it achieves a striking
verisimilitude in recreating the specific time and place.
On the other hand, the heart of the story is
essentially a tired show-business cliché: a poor and troubled young underdog
(Jimmy Smith, Jr., a.k.a. “Bunny Rabbit,” portrayed by the controversial
shock-rapper Eminem) is determined to “make it to the big time” (shades of
“Hey, kids, let’s put on a show!”). It’s not unlike any of the “Rocky”
movies, but with rapping substituting for boxing.
At one point, Smith’s equally ambitious
wannabe-model girlfriend—Brittany Murphy’s Alex—actually turns to him and
declares with utter earnestness, “I just [ITAL] know [ITAL] you’re gonna be
great!” [ITAL] Ugh. [ITAL]
There is also the problem of the film—which
is a thinly veiled retelling of Eminem’s own story—freely rewriting history
to the point of propaganda, with the obvious intention of turning the
sometimes homophobic and misogynistic bad-boy rapper into a sweeter, more
lovable character who (cue the violins) “just happens to be misunderstood.”
As usual, Eminem rejected most interview
requests to support the film. But I spoke with director Hanson and raised
many of these issues during a frank and revealing conversation a week before
the film’s release.
Q. I’m curious, Curtis, about why you
decided to make a hip-hop film after “Wonder Boys.” What drew you to this
subject matter?
A. I don’t consider it a, quote, “hip-hop”
film.
Q. Well, I say that in the best way: I think
it’s one of the first films to actually capture the artistry of the music.
The scenes in that smoky club do for hip-hop what I think “Sid and Nancy”
did for the punk explosion, in terms of capturing the energy behind the
music.
A. Well, now you’re talking. In other words,
I wouldn’t call “Sid and Nancy” a “punk film.” When you think of a, quote,
“hip-hop movie,” you tend to think of movies that in one way or another
either simulate the violence of hip-hop—the guns and drugs—or just exploit
hip-hop as a groove thing in the comic movies. Whereas this picture, on the
one hand, it’s a story of a group of young people trying to figure out how
to lead their lives in a city that could be any city in America when the
conventional or traditional sign posts that might guide them are either gone
or are illegible. And specifically it’s also about one character who’s got
all this emotion that he doesn’t really know what to do with, and he finds a
way of channeling it into his art.
It’s interesting, when you mention “Sid and
Nancy,” which I find so apt in its own way, when I do a picture, I tend to
have a little film festival with my collaborators when they come on board.
The idea is to get them to know each other and have something to talk about,
but also to give them some insight. Not show them something that I want to
imitate, but maybe give them some insight into the thematic material. Had I
thought of “Sid and Nancy,” I would have shown it. One of the pictures that
I did show, which might be illuminating, was “Hoop Dreams,” which is again
about characters with a dream and a hope. Our movie could have been about
basketball, but it happens that their thing is hip-hop. In another era, it
might have been boxing, and I also showed “Raging Bull.”
One of the things that really fascinated me
about the potential of this material was to go into this whole thing of
freestyle [rap] battling, which I knew about but had never seen. I loved the
notion of these people using words as weapons instead of fists, especially
when you know about our failed school systems and all that. The fact that
they’re rhyming the words and doing it to a beat and doing it under time
pressure and improvising… I mean, the dexterity of it is just so impressive.
At a certain point somebody said to me, “This seems so completely different
than anything you’ve done.” And I said, “Well, wait a minute, ‘Wonder Boys’
was all about characters who loved words. Characters who exist in a
different class.”
Q. As a Baby Boomer, you’re not a member of
the hip-hop generation. Were you a fan of the music before starting this
film?
A. I knew hip-hop, but not in any way was I
an aficionado. I knew Eminem and the broad-strokes people—Tupac [Shakur] and
Biggie [Smalls]. There were things I liked and things I didn’t like. It
really interested me culturally, though, and the reaction to it over the
last decade, the way in which it stirred so many of the things that were
reminiscent of what rock ‘n’ roll stirred—fear and negativity and the intent
to ignore it or write it off as something that was noise or something that
would go away quickly. In the development, after I got the original script
that Brian Grazer developed and then committed to do it, my number-one thing
was to try and be truthful to the world that this movie would take an
audience into. As I started exploring that world, the first thing that I
came to the conclusion of was that this movie had to be moved from the
present to the past. And even though 1995 is not very long ago in real
years, in hip-hop and pop culture, it’s a long time ago.
The whole idea of the character being white
and exploring this world that he has a voice in obviously is better in 1995
in that time when hip-hop was already big but had not exploded across our
entire culture. And I also loved the fact that while our characters were
battling and using words to battle, on the national scene, on the airwaves
and on disc, you had the east coast/west coast battle in the personas of
Tupac and Biggie, and for people who knew, you knew that this time was about
to change forever as words were replaced by guns.
Q. Did Grazer write the script with Eminem
in mind? Because this movie will be perceived for better or worse as “the
Eminem story.”
A. It’s an interesting thing: The idea was
not about Eminem. Grazer first wanted to develop a script in that world,
then he hit on Eminem as the guy. Scott Silver, the writer was hired to
[re-]write the script, his goal was to attempt to be truthful to that world,
and it is the world from which Eminem comes, so naturally there are places
where it overlaps his life. I mean, it all takes place in a week, so it
isn’t like a biography. But it certainly overlaps his life and it overlaps
the lives of anybody else that came from that world, though nobody came from
it in quite the way that he did.
Q. The thing that I liked about best about
the movie is the verisimilitude of that world. But as a critic, I find
Eminem to be a troubling figure. Yes, he is undeniably talented. But it’s
disappointing how little he does with his music on an artistic level, beyond
cheap shock and easy sensationalism.
A. I have two answers for that. First of
all, I love that you used the word “verisimilitude.” The first question that
faced me in terms of deciding whether or not to make this movie was, “Could
the script be further developed to deal with all these themes in a really
interesting way?” And then number two, “Could Eminem play the part and be
sufficiently good that he could carry a movie in which he’s in literally
every scene?” The interesting thing is that the answer to both questions
came out of getting to know him and Detroit. The original script, while it
said Detroit, was very vague. But the more I spent time in Detroit, the more
I talked with him about the world he came from, and the more committed I
became that this movie had to be done in Detroit.
Q. You really got Detroit right. I spent a
lot of time there researching a book, and the things that struck me about
the city were the racial divide—the movie’s title comes from 8 Mile Road,
which separates “white” Detroit from the “black” inner-city—and the sort of
self-deprecating but defiant attitude that both races share: “Yeah, this
place is a hellhole, but we’re damn proud of it!”
A. You got it! You got it in spades! While
we were shooting, naturally, the political types were all worried:
“Everywhere you’re going looks s----y, why don’t you show the Renaissance
Center?” But what I found interesting was the life experience of the people
in Detroit: Yes it’s grim, and yes it’s discouraging in certain ways, but
the people have such spirit that it’s incredibly inspiring. I tried to
capture that as the spirit of the movie, because I think it is really
uplifting. And I think that the racial thing in Detroit, again, is really
interesting and thought-provoking. Aside from being a “black city,” there
was almost an absence of attitude [about race] that we all found really
welcoming. As [the character] Future says [to Eminem] at the beginning of
the movie, “They’re not laughing at you ’cause you’re wack, they’re laughing
’cause you’re white with a mike. But once they hear you, it won’t matter
what color you are.” To me, that is such a positive statement: This is not
about black against white, but it’s about people who are all of the same
class.
Q. However, other parts of the movie play as
revisionism. Jimmy Iovine, the head of Eminem’s record company, couldn’t
have scripted a better scene to redeem him in the public view than the scene
where he rushes to the defense of a gay co-worker. In fact, if you listen to
Eminem’s lyrics, he has been guilty of saying some horrible things about gay
people. Fans talk about his lyrical skills, but as a critic, I long for him
to write about something real and important instead of hurling easy and
hateful insults.
A. I completely agree with you. When people
start comparing him to Dylan or whatever, I go, “Well, wait a minute: He
needs to expand beyond his personal thing.” But, in his defense, the little
that he does is more than anybody else in the pop scene is doing, and my
hope is—and this is personal, because I like him—that he will evolve into a
wider worldview.
Eminem for me is unimportant. What was
important to me was Marshall Mathers, the actor, in my movie, and could he
play the part. At the beginning, a lot of people went, “Wait a minute, what
are you doing hooking up with this guy?” My feeling was, “If he can play
this part, then the audience will invest in him and then Eminem and Slim
Shady will be irrelevant.” And truthfully, I think my having that attitude
was the beginning of the foundation of trust between the two of us. Because
at the time that I was checking him out, he was clearly checking me out,
too. I made it very clear to him that my interest in telling the story was
not based on having Eminem in it. Eminem was a question mark to me, and he
liked that, because he also made it clear to me that he had no interest in
being in “an Eminem movie,” a two-hour video where he would just kind of
cruise along being Slim Shady. He wanted to play a part in a really good
movie. That’s what I satisfied myself with–that and the fact that I also
needed to know would he apply himself with the same dedication to this that
he applies obviously to his music.
Q. As someone who’s a judge of good acting,
could Eminem have played a completely different role, like one of the
characters in “Wonder Boys”? Because the great debate in pop music is how
much of what we see in public is this character Eminem, how much is his
alter ego Slim Shady, and how much is the “real” Marshall Mathers.
A. Well, that’s a legitimate question, if
one is saying, “What is his potential future as an actor?” To me, he really
delivers in this movie, and I hope it will be acknowledged that he does. At
the same time, though, I’m well aware that through the history of movies,
many of the best actors were underrated at the time because people thought,
“Oh, they’re just playing themselves.” Versatility is not necessarily the
key to what I think of as great movie acting. Playing yourself—or appearing
to play yourself, appearing to have no technique—is in fact the hardest
thing to do, and it gives the audience the strongest emotional connection.
John Wayne for instance does that. Humphrey Bogart does that; Clint Eastwood
does that. Does it matter that if they try to do something to show
versatility, maybe they’re not as adept at it as, let’s say, Olivier was? To
me that doesn’t matter. I think asking Marshall to play somebody from a
completely different class, like when you compare him to the Robert Downey,
Jr. role in “Wonder Boys”—well, Downey couldn’t play Jimmy Rabbit. But if
somebody today was making a remake of “The Great Escape,” and you were
dealing with P.O.W.’s from various places in America, [Eminem] could
definitely be one of those guys. He doesn’t have to rap to do his thing.
Q. But Eminem has created such a larger than
life persona, it eclipses his art. I’m sure it’s going to be problem when
this movie is judged, just like it is when his music is judged.
A. I don’t know. We’ve had a couple of
screenings now, and one of them was in New York, and I attended and
afterwards did a Q&A. One of the women there stood up and as part of her
question she said, “I have to tell you first, I hate everything about
Eminem. I didn’t want to see this movie, but I found him absolutely
captivating. My kids are going to be so stunned when I tell them that I
loved this movie.” And I said, “Maybe you shouldn’t tell them, because it
may turn them off!”
All I can say is, in terms of holding the
screen, that ability is not my creation; that’s God-given. Neither I nor any
director can give that to somebody.
Q. Well, no one ever said Eminem is not
charismatic. If he wasn’t, he wouldn’t have the vice-president’s wife
attacking him.
A. There you go! What I can do with him or
any actor is put a frame around it and help people see it better. But the
other thing I found in spending time with him is that I liked him, and had I
not liked him, I wouldn’t have wanted to go down this road with him. One of
the things that actually appealed to me about this movie is that there was a
director named Don Siegel of whom I was a great fan, and he was one of my
sponsors when I joined the Director’s Guild a long time ago. He directed
Elvis in one of his first movies, “Flaming Star.” When I heard Eminem was
doing this, I thought, “That’s kind of a cool tip of the hat to Don.” But on
a more serious level, I as a movie fan have always wondered what would have
happened if Elvis Presley, instead of following Col. Parker’s wishes, would
have really given his all to acting? Elvis could have been really good, and
just on a personal level, it might well have changed his entire life if he’d
gotten into something that he could have developed and improved at as he’d
gotten older. Imagine if he was starring opposite Barbara Streisand in “A
Star Is Born.”
Q. I gather that at one point, the movie was
originally a bit like Prince’s “Purple Rain,” with half a dozen original
Eminem songs and some animated Slim Shady sequences. Those are gone now,
there’s just the freestyle rap battling, and the new Eminem track “Lose
Yourself” over the closing credits.
A. I don’t know of another movie where you
actually see a character struggling to write, to find his voice, hear
fragments of what he’s composing, and at the end of the movie hear the
full-blown version of it. The song that he wrote at the end of the movie, I
had the miraculous one-two combination of Bob Dylan [contributing to the
soundtrack] on “Wonder Boys,” and now Eminem on this, and he worked on that
song for months while we were shooting this movie, because it was very
difficult for him. His whole thing is writing about his life and writing his
character, and what I wanted him to do was write a song that Jimmy would
have written. Ultimately what he did was both. He wrote about Jimmy in the
third person, and then he turns it around to himself, which is perfect for
the end titles. It carries us in to a whole other thing.
One last thing in terms of music that you
might be interested in is the battling. None of that was scripted. Through
the rehearsal process, six weeks and then through the course of shooting,
Eminem and I talked about what the [raps] needed to do to move the story
along and to speak to the character, including defending the gay guy. And
then what happened was Marshall wrote all of those lyrics, and his opponents
wrote theirs. We also employed a well-known freestyler named Craig G., and I
would give him specifics and he would construct some lyrics and I would give
them to the other actors to work on them, and then Marshall threw in his two
cents as well.
My goal was to very much thread a needle—on
the one hand to make a movie that hip-hop fans found entertaining, and at
the same time tell it in such a way so truthfully that that woman, someone
who dislikes hip-hop, might come out not necessarily a fan of it, but
understanding it and the emotion that gave voice to it. If something speaks
artfully of an emotional truth, that truth will connect with people and
transcend the borders from which it came.
BACK |
|